True or False: Conditions are clearer than the law of breach.

Conditions refer to specific provisions or events that must occur for a contract to be enforceable or for a party's obligations to arise. They provide a clear framework for what is required for the parties involved to fulfill their contractual duties. In contrast, the law of breach relates to the legal ramifications when one party does not uphold their end of the agreement. Breach of contract can be ambiguous and can hinge on various factors, such as intent, materiality, and damages.

Because conditions delineate specific performance requirements in a more straightforward manner, they indeed tend to be clearer than the complexities involved in determining what constitutes a breach of contract. The interpretation of a breach can depend on multiple legal interpretations, case law, and the specific contexts in which the breach occurs, making it less clear than the established conditions of the contract.

Thus, asserting that conditions are clearer than the law of breach is accurate, as they provide explicit guidelines for performance, whereas breaches can involve nuanced legal considerations that may vary significantly depending on the situation.